[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211209215149.2661929-1-broonie@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 21:51:49 +0000
From: broonie@...nel.org
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"Maciej S . Szmigiero" <maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the perf tree
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
between commit:
2aef6f306b39b ("perf: Force architectures to opt-in to guest callbacks")
from the perf tree and commit:
ed922739c9199 ("KVM: Use interval tree to do fast hva lookup in memslots")
from the kvm tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
diff --cc arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
index e9761d84f982e,f1f8fc069a970..0000000000000
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
@@@ -39,7 -39,7 +39,8 @@@ menuconfig KV
select HAVE_KVM_IRQ_BYPASS
select HAVE_KVM_VCPU_RUN_PID_CHANGE
select SCHED_INFO
+ select GUEST_PERF_EVENTS if PERF_EVENTS
+ select INTERVAL_TREE
help
Support hosting virtualized guest machines.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists