linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: dts: elpida_ecb240abacn: Change Elpida compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YbGsAxOOHHJfDUCT@atomide.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Dec 2021 09:10:59 +0200
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: dts: elpida_ecb240abacn: Change Elpida compatible

Hi,

* Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com> [211027 12:19]:
> 20.10.2021 02:40, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> > Vendor prefix shouldn't start with capital letter. The Elpida Memory
> > compatible was never used in practice, hence just correct the compatible.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi
> > index d87ee4794f83..9698801cbcfb 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi
> > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
> >  
> >  / {
> >  	elpida_ECB240ABACN: lpddr2 {
> > -		compatible	= "Elpida,ECB240ABACN","jedec,lpddr2-s4";
> > +		compatible	= "elpida,ECB240ABACN","jedec,lpddr2-s4";
> >  		density		= <2048>;
> >  		io-width	= <32>;
> >  
> > 
> 
> This patch should go via OMAP tree since there is only OMAP board which
> uses this dtsi. To make it more clear, "elpida" variant is now
> documented in the bindings [1][2].
> 
> [1]
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=9e17f71e9c334f14ad6a8ec3edc09c7a4244e12f
> 
> [2]
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=001b8b2594db4ea24fbea4c161e665f858917fce
> 
> If there is no interest in taking the patch via OMAP tree, then it may
> go via the DT git tree. Rob, you should pick it up then.

Applying into omap-for-v5.17/dt thanks.

Regards,

Tony