[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211209110918.GA11977@elementary>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 12:09:18 +0100
From: José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
"alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"vivien.didelot@...il.com" <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: felix: Fix memory leak in
felix_setup_mmio_filtering
On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 03:10:30PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 18:13:32 +0000 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > Impossible memory leak, I might add, because DSA will error out much
> > soon if there isn't any CPU port defined:
> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.15.7/source/net/dsa/dsa2.c#L374
> > I don't think I should have added the "if (cpu < 0)" check at all, but
> > then it would have raised other flags, about BIT(negative number) or
> > things like that. I don't know what's the best way to deal with this?
> >
> > Anyway, in case we find no better alternative:
> >
> > Fixes: 8d5f7954b7c8 ("net: dsa: felix: break at first CPU port during init and teardown")
> > Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
>
> If this is the way to go please repost with the tags added
> and a commit message.
Thanks for the quick review. I just sent v2 in case you decide to keep
the cpu check:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20211209110538.11585-1-jose.exposito89@gmail.com/T/#u
Jose
Powered by blists - more mailing lists