linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] clk: qcom: Add clocks for SM8450 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YbHwvQFtg992DlgL@matsya>
Date:   Thu, 9 Dec 2021 17:34:13 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Vamsi Krishna Lanka <quic_vamslank@...cinc.com>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] clk: qcom: Add clocks for SM8450 SoC

On 09-12-21, 00:19, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Vinod Koul (2021-12-07 03:40:01)
> > This series adds the GCC clock support required for SM8450 SoC
> > along with devicetree binding for these clocks.
> > 
> > Please note that the GCC driver patch depends on new alpha LUCID_EVO
> > introduced by Vamsi in [1]. That would be required to be picked before this
> > patch can be applied.
> > 
> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/a0b04869a20a0afef99dd457ebb6474f50591210.1637302009.git.quic_vamslank@quicinc.com/
> 
> Can you use --base with format-patch please so that kbuild robot doesn't
> get angry? I think the robot may be able to find the patches and apply
> them now if you tell it what to base it on.

Aha, it would be interesting if bot is able to pick a patch using
--base, let me try that for next rev and see if it is happy

-- 
~Vinod