[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b5e6ec36-a9ec-22f4-be58-28d48bdc38b4@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 20:50:54 -0500
From: Nayna <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kexec@...ts.infradead.org, Philipp Rudo <prudo@...hat.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Frank van der Linden <fllinden@...zon.com>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>,
Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>, buendgen@...ibm.com,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] KEXEC_SIG with appended signature
On 11/25/21 13:02, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Michael,
>
> This is resend of the KEXEC_SIG patchset.
>
> The first patch is new because it'a a cleanup that does not require any
> change to the module verification code.
>
> The second patch is the only one that is intended to change any
> functionality.
>
> The rest only deduplicates code but I did not receive any review on that
> part so I don't know if it's desirable as implemented.
>
> The first two patches can be applied separately without the rest.
Patch 2 fails to apply on v5.16-rc4. Can you please also include git
tree/branch while posting the patches ?
Secondly, I see that you add the powerpc support in Patch 2 and then
modify it again in Patch 5 after cleanup. Why not add the support for
powerpc after the clean up ? This will reduce some rework and also
probably simplify patches.
Thanks & Regards,
- Nayna
Powered by blists - more mailing lists