[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3389cd7b-2934-8e82-b09a-a4fdb0f00ea3@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 14:42:55 +0000
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC: <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<hare@...e.de>, <ming.lei@...hat.com>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] blk-mq: Fix blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() for shared tags
On 09/12/2021 13:52, Kashyap Desai wrote:
> + scsi mailing list
>
>> On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 17:41:23 +0800, John Garry wrote:
>>> Since it is now possible for a tagset to share a single set of tags,
>>> the iter function should not re-iter the tags for the count of #hw
>>> queues in that case. Rather it should just iter once.
> John - Recently we found issue of error hander thread never kicked off and
> this patch fix the issue.
> Without this patch, scsi error hander will not find correct host_busy
> counter.
>
> Take one simple case. There is one IO outstanding and that is getting
> timedout.
> Now SML wants to wake up EH thread only if, below condition met
> "scsi_host_busy(shost) == shost->host_failed"
>
> Without this patch, shared host tag enabled meagaraid_sas driver will find
> host_busy = actual outstanding * nr_hw_queues.
> Error handler thread will never be kicked-off.
>
> This patch is mandatory for fixing shared host tag feature and require to be
> part of stable kernel.
>
> Do you need more data for posting to stable kernel ?
To be clear, are you saying that you see the issue which patch "blk-mq:
Fix blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() for shared tags" fixes before v5.16-rc?
This patch (now commit 0994c64eb415) and the commit which it is supposed
to fix, e155b0c238b2, will only be in v5.16, so I don't see anything
which is needed in stable.
Thanks,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists