[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211209150938.3518-4-dwmw2@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 15:09:30 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, mimoja@...oja.de, hewenliang4@...wei.com,
hushiyuan@...wei.com, luolongjun@...wei.com, hejingxian@...wei.com
Subject: [PATCH 03/11] rcu: Add mutex for rcu boost kthread spawning and affinity setting
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
As we handle parallel CPU bringup, we will need to take care to avoid
spawning multiple boost threads, or race conditions when setting their
affinity. Spotted by Paul McKenney.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 1 +
kernel/rcu/tree.h | 3 +++
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 10 ++++++++--
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index a1bb0b1229ed..809855474b39 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -4527,6 +4527,7 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(void)
init_waitqueue_head(&rnp->exp_wq[2]);
init_waitqueue_head(&rnp->exp_wq[3]);
spin_lock_init(&rnp->exp_lock);
+ mutex_init(&rnp->boost_kthread_mutex);
}
}
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index aff4cc9303fb..055e30b3e5e0 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -108,6 +108,9 @@ struct rcu_node {
/* side effect, not as a lock. */
unsigned long boost_time;
/* When to start boosting (jiffies). */
+ struct mutex boost_kthread_mutex;
+ /* Exclusion for thread spawning and affinity */
+ /* manipulation. */
struct task_struct *boost_kthread_task;
/* kthread that takes care of priority */
/* boosting for this rcu_node structure. */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 5199559fbbf0..3b4ee0933710 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -1162,15 +1162,16 @@ static void rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(struct rcu_node *rnp)
struct sched_param sp;
struct task_struct *t;
+ mutex_lock(&rnp->boost_kthread_mutex);
if (rnp->boost_kthread_task || !rcu_scheduler_fully_active)
- return;
+ goto out;
rcu_state.boost = 1;
t = kthread_create(rcu_boost_kthread, (void *)rnp,
"rcub/%d", rnp_index);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(t)))
- return;
+ goto out;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
rnp->boost_kthread_task = t;
@@ -1178,6 +1179,9 @@ static void rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(struct rcu_node *rnp)
sp.sched_priority = kthread_prio;
sched_setscheduler_nocheck(t, SCHED_FIFO, &sp);
wake_up_process(t); /* get to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE quickly. */
+
+ out:
+ mutex_unlock(&rnp->boost_kthread_mutex);
}
/*
@@ -1200,6 +1204,7 @@ static void rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(struct rcu_node *rnp, int outgoingcpu)
return;
if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cm, GFP_KERNEL))
return;
+ mutex_lock(&rnp->boost_kthread_mutex);
for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu)
if ((mask & leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu)) &&
cpu != outgoingcpu)
@@ -1207,6 +1212,7 @@ static void rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(struct rcu_node *rnp, int outgoingcpu)
if (cpumask_weight(cm) == 0)
cpumask_setall(cm);
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(t, cm);
+ mutex_unlock(&rnp->boost_kthread_mutex);
free_cpumask_var(cm);
}
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists