| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 03:08:39 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Joseph CHANG <josright123@...il.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: Add DM9051 driver
> +static int burst_xfer(struct board_info *db, u8 cmdphase, u8 *txb, u8 *rxb, unsigned int len)
> +static int dm_phy_read_func(struct board_info *db, int reg)
> +static int dm9051_phy_read_lock(struct net_device *dev, int phy_reg_unused, int reg)
Please be consistent with your namespace. Please use the dm9051_
prefix everywhere.
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + iow(db, DM9051_EPAR, DM9051_PHY | reg);
> + iow(db, DM9051_EPCR, EPCR_ERPRR | EPCR_EPOS);
> + while (ior(db, DM9051_EPCR) & EPCR_ERRE)
> + ;
include/linux/iopoll.h No potentially endless loops please.
> +static unsigned int dm9051_chipid(struct device *dev, struct board_info *db)
> +{
> + unsigned int chipid;
> +
> + chipid = iior(dev, db, DM9051_PIDL);
> + chipid |= (unsigned int)iior(dev, db, DM9051_PIDH) << 8;
> + if (chipid == (DM9051_ID >> 16))
> + return chipid;
> + chipid = iior(dev, db, DM9051_PIDL);
> + chipid |= (unsigned int)iior(dev, db, DM9051_PIDH) << 8;
> + if (chipid == (DM9051_ID >> 16))
> + return chipid;
> + dev_info(dev, "Read [DM9051_PID] = %04x\n", chipid);
> + dev_info(dev, "Read [DM9051_PID] error!\n");
> + return 0;
If this is an error case, returning 0 is not a good idea. -ENODEV?
> +static void dm9051_phy_advertise_pausecap_func(struct board_info *db)
> +{
> + int phy4 = dm_phy_read_func(db, MII_ADVERTISE); //DBG_20140407
> +
> + dm_phy_write_func(db, MII_ADVERTISE, phy4 | ADVERTISE_PAUSE_CAP); // dm95 flow-control RX!
> +}
Use seem to be using the deprecated mii code. Please replace it with
phylib. phylib will then do things like advertising.
> +static void dm9051_reset(struct board_info *db)
> +{
> + mdelay(2); //delay 2 ms any need before NCR_RST (20170510)
Since this is a new driver, there is no history. Comments like
20170510 don't add anything useful.
> +static void IMR_DISABLE_LOCK_ESSENTIAL(struct board_info *db)
Don't use upper case for functions.
> +{
> + ADDR_LOCK_HEAD_ESSENTIAL(db);
> + imr_reg_stop(db);
> + ADDR_LOCK_TAIL_ESSENTIAL(db);
> +}
> +static int dm9051_read_mac_to_dev(struct device *dev, struct net_device *ndev,
> + struct board_info *db)
> +{
> + int i;
> + u8 mac_fix[ETH_ALEN] = { 0x00, 0x60, 0x6e, 0x90, 0x51, 0xee };
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ETH_ALEN; i++)
> + ndev->dev_addr[i] = ior(db, DM9051_PAR + i);
> + if (!is_valid_ether_addr(ndev->dev_addr)) {
You should use a random MAC address. eth_hw_addr_random(ndev);
> + for (i = 0; i < ETH_ALEN; i++)
> + iow(db, DM9051_PAR + i, mac_fix[i]);
> + for (i = 0; i < ETH_ALEN; i++)
> + ndev->dev_addr[i] = ior(db, DM9051_PAR + i);
> + dev_info(dev, "dm9 [reg_netdev][%s][chip MAC: %pM (%s)]\n",
> + ndev->name, ndev->dev_addr, "FIX-1");
dev_dbg() ?
> + return 0;
> + }
> + return 1;
If this is an error, please use an error code.
> +static void dm_set_mac_lock(struct board_info *db)
> +{
> + struct net_device *ndev = db->ndev;
> +
> + if (db->enter_setmac) {
> + int i, oft;
> +
> + db->enter_setmac = 0;
> + netdev_info(ndev, "set_mac_address %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x\n",
> + ndev->dev_addr[0], ndev->dev_addr[1], ndev->dev_addr[2],
> + ndev->dev_addr[3], ndev->dev_addr[4], ndev->dev_addr[5]);
netdev_dbg()
Also, %pM can be used here.
> +static
> +const struct net_device_ops dm9051_netdev_ops = {
> + .ndo_open = dm9051_open,
> + .ndo_stop = dm9051_stop,
> + .ndo_start_xmit = DM9051_START_XMIT,
> + .ndo_set_rx_mode = dm9051_set_multicast_list_schedule,
_schedule? This is called in a context you can make blocking calls. So
i don't see why you need the work queue.
> +static void dm9051_get_drvinfo(struct net_device *dev,
> + struct ethtool_drvinfo *info)
> +{
> + struct board_info *dm = to_dm9051_board(dev);
> +
> + strscpy(info->driver, DRVNAME_9051, sizeof(info->driver));
> + strscpy(info->version, dm->DRV_VERSION, sizeof(info->version));
version is meaningless. Please leave it empty, and the core will fill
it in with the kernel version.
> + strscpy(info->bus_info, dev_name(dev->dev.parent), sizeof(info->bus_info));
> +}
> +
> +/* LNX_KERNEL_v58 */
58? We are only at version 5 at the moment?
> +/* Tips: reset and increase the RST counter
> + */
Tips?
> +static void dm9051_fifo_reset(u8 state, u8 *hstr, struct board_info *db)
> +{
> + db->bc.DO_FIFO_RST_counter++;
> + dm9051_reset(db);
> +}
> +
> +static void dm9051_reset_dm9051(struct board_info *db, int rxlen)
> +{
> + struct net_device *ndev = db->ndev;
> + char *sbuff = (char *)db->prxhdr;
> + char hstr[72];
> +
> + netdev_info(ndev, "dm9-pkt-Wrong RxLen over-range (%x= %d > %x= %d)\n",
> + rxlen, rxlen, DM9051_PKT_MAX, DM9051_PKT_MAX);
> +
> + db->bc.large_err_counter++;
> + db->bc.mac_ovrsft_counter++; //increase the MAC over_shift counter
> + dm9051_fifo_reset(11, hstr, db);
> + sprintf(hstr, "dmfifo_reset( 11 RxLenErr ) rxhdr %02x %02x %02x %02x (quick)",
> + sbuff[0], sbuff[1], sbuff[2], sbuff[3]);
> + netdev_info(ndev, "%s\n", hstr);
> + netdev_info(ndev, "dm9 reset-done: of LargeRxLen\n");
> + netdev_info(ndev, " RxLenErr&MacOvrSft_Er %d, RST_c %d\n",
> + db->bc.mac_ovrsft_counter,
> + db->bc.DO_FIFO_RST_counter);
There is a lot of kernel log spamming going on here. Please either
remove this, of use netdev_dbg(). Please look throught all the uses of
_info() and see if they are actually useful, or should be removed.
> +#define dm_msg_open_done(nd, maddr, irqn) \
> + netdev_info(nd, "[dm_open] %pM irq_no %d ACTIVE_LOW\n", maddr, irqn)
Please don't use macros like this.
> +#define init_sched_phy(db) schedule_delayed_work(&(db)->phy_poll, HZ * 1)
No, no, no.
This code feels like it is a vendor crap driver, with an abstraction
over the OS. That is not how Linux drivers should work. If you need to
lock a mutux, call the mutex_lock(), not a wrapper around
mutex_lock. Please remove all these wrapper.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists