[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YbObeiWbLxO8MwrD@dev0025.ash9.facebook.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:24:58 -0800
From: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
jikos@...nel.org, mbenes@...e.cz, joe.lawrence@...hat.com,
corbet@....net, yhs@...com, songliubraving@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: livepatch: Add kernel-doc link to
klp_enable_patch
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote on Fri [2021-Dec-10 10:25:05 +0100]:
>
> Honestly, I do not like this. It might be acceptable when it converts
> klp_enable_patch() into a link pointing to another page describing the API.
>
> But this patch causes the entire documentation of klp_enable_patch()
> inserted into livepatch.html. It does not fit there and breaks
> the text flow.
Thank you for taking a look at the patch, Petr.
I'm happy to revise the patch to instead add a new `api.rst` file that
contains the `kernel-doc` directive, which would cause `klp_enable_patch()`
in `livepatch.rst` to automatically link to the separate page as you
suggested.
Just to check though -- I see that `shadow-vars.rst` and `system-state.rst`
have their own "API" sections. Is it preferable to add such a section
directly to `livepatch.rst`, rather than creating a separate file?
Let me know either way and I'll send a v2 patch with your preference.
Kind regards,
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists