linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/10] dt-bindings: media: nxp,imx8mq-vpu: Support split G1 and G2 nodes with vpu-blk-ctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAEAJfAuH_cupFkEN=5M3fy-JJ401EB3f2-6yvXFt9zJ4rYW4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 10 Dec 2021 15:32:54 -0300
From:   Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>
To:     Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
Cc:     Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>,
        Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>,
        Adam Ford-BE <aford@...conembedded.com>,
        Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "open list:HANTRO VPU CODEC DRIVER" 
        <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] dt-bindings: media: nxp,imx8mq-vpu: Support split
 G1 and G2 nodes with vpu-blk-ctrl

> >
> > I'm in favor of dropping the old binding from the schema. New DTs
> > should clearly use the new binding and old DTs shouldn't change
> > anymore, so validation is less useful there.
>
> I wonder if it makes sense to have a more standardized hantro schema
> for all the users instead of one dedicated to each platform using a
> hantro driver.  The unified schema could have all the various
> compatible flags so the driver still knows which features are
> enabled/disabled and it's very clear who all the users are for it. I
> would think it could cover both the encoder and decoder variants as
> well.  We do something similar for 8250 serial ports.
>
> If so, can someone from the media group suggest the best one to
> follow?  Ezequiel suggested I look at the sama5d4-vdec to help reduce
> some clutter in the driver.  If that binding is good enough, should I
> just add the compatible flags to that and potentially rename it.
>

A unified schema might sound elegant and compelling, but I suspect
it can bite us down the road, due to differences in the platform integration.

Seems we are all on-board going forward with a patch similar to this one,
but also dropping the deprecated binding from the schema (while of course
still supporting old DTBs on new kernels).

Rob's suggestion about having a warning in the platform if the binding has
not been updated, sounds like very useful too.

Keep in mind v5.16-rc5 is near, which means we still have a few weeks to
discuss this patch, until the next linux-media merge season.

Thanks,
Ezequiel