[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YbOlLawFDdS0hkpd@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 09:06:21 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Michal Koutny <mkoutny@...e.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jim Newsome <jnewsome@...project.org>,
Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Security Officers <security@...nel.org>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] cgroup: Allocate cgroup_file_ctx for
kernfs_open_file->priv
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 10:45:33AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> But if it then ever becomes a possible source of confusion and it's
> not obvious from the context who uses what, I'd rather use the extra 8
> bytes in the allocation.
>
> Ok?
Just so that I'm understanding you correctly. The following is what I was
suggesting. ie. just dropping the union and making the iterator embedded:
struct cgroup_file_ctx {
struct cgroup_namespace ns;
struct {
struct css_task_iter it;
} procs;
struct {
void *trigger;
} psi;
};
and I was wondering whether you wanted something like the following:
struct cgroup_file_ctx {
struct cgroup_namespace ns;
struct css_task_iter it;
void *trigger;
};
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists