linux-kernel - [GIT PULL] Power management fix for v5.16-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0j+7Kz6n_WfjJuVaxt+MNVo77KikSPKQDB-4iT8ozGfww@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 10 Dec 2021 20:51:22 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [GIT PULL] Power management fix for v5.16-rc5

Hi Linus,

Please pull from the tag

 git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git \
 pm-5.16-rc5

with top-most commit 444dd878e85fb33fcfb2682cfdab4c236f33ea3e

 PM: runtime: Fix pm_runtime_active() kerneldoc comment

on top of commit 0fcfb00b28c0b7884635dacf38e46d60bf3d4eb1

 Linux 5.16-rc4

to receive a power management fix for 5.16-rc5.

This fixes a kernedoc comment that doesn't match the behavior of the
function documented by it.

Thanks!


---------------

Rafael J. Wysocki (1):
      PM: runtime: Fix pm_runtime_active() kerneldoc comment

---------------

 include/linux/pm_runtime.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)