[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <163911016975.9928.6568675782275129@noble.neil.brown.name>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 15:22:49 +1100
From: "NeilBrown" <neilb@...e.de>
To: "OGAWA Hirofumi" <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] FAT: use schedule_timeout_uninterruptible() instead of
congestion_wait()
congestion_wait() in this context is just a sleep - block devices do not
in general support congestion signalling any more.
The goal here is to wait for any recently written data to get to
storage. blkdev_issue_flush() is thought to be too expensive, so
replace congestion_wait() with an explicit timeout.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
---
fs/fat/file.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fat/file.c b/fs/fat/file.c
index 13855ba49cd9..2321fb3eded5 100644
--- a/fs/fat/file.c
+++ b/fs/fat/file.c
@@ -175,9 +175,9 @@ long fat_generic_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
static int fat_file_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
{
if ((filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE) &&
- MSDOS_SB(inode->i_sb)->options.flush) {
+ MSDOS_SB(inode->i_sb)->options.flush) {
fat_flush_inodes(inode->i_sb, inode, NULL);
- congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
+ schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(HZ/10);
}
return 0;
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists