[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YbPNHcF9UrvrR5jb@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 13:56:45 -0800
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, jeyu@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Next/Trees: update the modules tree
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 09:38:48PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 11:59:31AM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
>
> > pull request which was merged for v5.16-rc1. I'll queue up fixes
> > on the modules_linus branch.
>
> > those in the modules_next branch to match parity with the same style
>
> Actually, note that your e-mail says the branches are modules_X while
> the diff says modules-X which looks like it's the correct thing:
modules-linus and modules-next are the correct ones indeed.
Sorry about the confusion.
Luis
>
> > -modules-fixes git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeyu/linux.git#modules-linus
> > +modules-fixes git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mcgrof/linux.git#modules-linus
>
> > -modules git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeyu/linux.git#modules-next
> > +modules git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mcgrof/linux.git#modules-next
Powered by blists - more mailing lists