[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a8275c2ee2a7fad619605b433d61077a03ed4796.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 16:08:37 +0800
From: James Lo <james.lo@...iatek.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 0/4] Add SPMI support for Mediatek SoC IC
On Thu, 2021-12-09 at 18:12 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting James Lo (2021-11-18 19:46:09)
> > This series adds support for new SoC MT6873/MT8192/MT8195 to the
> > spmi driver.
> > This series is based on Chun-Jie's patches[1].
> >
> > [1]
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=521655__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!ycJplySfH-hTtYCIdjkF0VvfKgtq2B1NeOaBAOw5GU05898X6B7FN21KLkKTZiPC$
> >
>
> This isn't needed though right? I've picked these four patches up
> into
> spmi-next.
Yes. You are right.
It's just for notice the patch dependency.
Many Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists