[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9dcd7f1d-609d-c9f4-bcb1-c5e465383722@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 17:34:35 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/12] KVM: X86: Fix when shadow_root_level=5 && guest
root_level<4
On 2021/12/9 09:16, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
>>
>> If the is an L1 with nNPT in 32bit, the shadow walk starts with
>> pae_root.
>>
>> Fixes: a717a780fc4e ("KVM: x86/mmu: Support shadowing NPT when 5-level paging is enabled in host)
>
> Have you actually run with 5-level nNPT? I don't have access to hardware, at least
> not that I know of :-)
The code is just obvious incorrect for shadow_root_level=5 && guest root_level<4.
>
> I'm staring at kvm_mmu_sync_roots() and don't see how it can possibly work for
> 5-level nNPT with a 4-level NPT guest.
>
It doesn't use pml5_root for 5-level nNPT with a 4-level NPT guest, so
kvm_mmu_sync_roots() can work in a silence way with an "unexpected" root shadow
page. It has problems for 5-level nNPT with a 4-level NPT guest.
See:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211210092508.7185-1-jiangshanlai@gmail.com/
especially patch4.
Your this reply motivated me to complete the changelog of a patchset and send
it, thanks!
Although the patchset is immature, it would be better than losing it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists