[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3tqg2eewMA1jvg==hV-XfK4kMGimx9-oD8A1P69-K6ew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 11:49:42 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com>,
Nick Hu <nickhu@...estech.com>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] futex: Fix sparc32/m68k/nds32 build regression
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 11:39 AM Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> * Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Doesn't solve the regression on MIPS defconfig:
> ./arch/mips/include/asm/futex.h: In function 'arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser':
> ./arch/mips/include/asm/futex.h:89:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser_local'; did you mean 'futex_atomic_op_inuser_local'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 89 | ret = arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser_local(op, oparg, oval,\
Right, mips and xtensa still have the same problem that I fixed for
the others, I posted
another fix after the 0day bot reported it. I think
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211203080823.2938839-1-arnd@kernel.org/
should address the remaining regression.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists