[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2112101321010.5704@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 13:31:23 +0100 (CET)
From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] recordmcount.pl: look for jgnop instruction as well as
bcrl on s390
> > Otherwise I would be surprised that this would make any difference.
>
> How come? I mean, s390 does not define HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT which implies
> that recordmcount.pl is used (see scripts/Makefile.build and
> BUILD_C_RECORDMCOUNT definition in Makefile).
Ah, sorry, that was too quick.
I guess you want to say that recordmcount is not used at all and GCC
should do it. Because CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_USE_RECORDMCOUNT is not set,
since FTRACE_MCOUNT_USE_CC should be set.
What a maze.
But isn't -mrecord-mcount x86_64-only option?
Miroslav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists