[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MfZvtwRrY_qhO7vRwwR5=prqkORtfo8FW6YjkhB8jyxBw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 16:15:42 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Iwona Winiarska <iwona.winiarska@...el.com>
Cc: "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: aspeed-sgpio: Convert aspeed_sgpio.lock to raw_spinlock
On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 6:11 PM Iwona Winiarska
<iwona.winiarska@...el.com> wrote:
>
> The gpio-aspeed-sgpio driver implements an irq_chip which need to be
> invoked from hardirq context. Since spin_lock() can sleep with
> PREEMPT_RT, it is no longer legal to invoke it while interrupts are
> disabled.
> This also causes lockdep to complain about:
> [ 25.919465] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
> because aspeed_sgpio.lock (spin_lock_t) is taken under irq_desc.lock
> (raw_spinlock_t).
> Let's use of raw_spinlock_t instead of spinlock_t.
>
> Signed-off-by: Iwona Winiarska <iwona.winiarska@...el.com>
> ---
Applied, thanks!
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists