[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAOTY_-dO9hXaPCEhJymrCDYU-P-wOvS0YLYQ-gyYX1_morteg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 23:44:03 +0800
From: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
To: "jason-jh.lin" <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>
Cc: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, tzungbi@...gle.com,
Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Nancy Lin <nancy.lin@...iatek.com>, singo.chang@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mailbox: add control_by_sw for mt8195
Hi, Jason:
jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com> 於 2021年12月10日 週五 下午2:11寫道:
>
> To make sure the GCE request signal to SPM is not trigger by
> other HW modules and cause suspend premature wake.
>
> Set 0x7 (the bit 0~2 as 1) to GCE_GCTL_VALUE, to configure the
> request signal control by SW and release the request to SPM.
How does mt8173, mt8183, and mt6779 prevent this? Or these SoCs could
not prevent this?
Regards,
Chun-Kuang.
>
> Signed-off-by: jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> index a8845b162dbf..342b91f16e65 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ static const struct gce_plat gce_plat_v5 = {
> static const struct gce_plat gce_plat_v6 = {
> .thread_nr = 24,
> .shift = 3,
> - .control_by_sw = false,
> + .control_by_sw = true,
> .gce_num = 2
> };
>
> --
> 2.18.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists