[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cb29756b-8b21-5b4d-f107-b5573945d7ab@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 09:29:41 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] blk-crypto: show crypto capabilities in sysfs
On 12/9/21 10:42 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> A single hex value makes sense to me.
Hi Greg,
I'm not enthusiast about this approach because:
(a) A single hex value can be confused with a number. Reporting a bitfield in
hex format is not sufficient to prevent confusion with a number.
(b) No other block layer sysfs attribute follows this encoding scheme.
(c) This encoding enforces the restriction that data unit sizes are a power of
two. Is there anything fundamental in encryption that restricts data unit
sizes to a power of two? I don't know the answer myself.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists