linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the nvdimm tree with the ext4 tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 10 Dec 2021 17:47:40 +0000
From:   broonie@...nel.org
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the nvdimm tree with the ext4 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the nvdimm tree got a conflict in:

  fs/ext4/super.c

between at least commits:

  7edfd85b1ffd3 ("ext4: Completely separate options parsing and sb setup")
  bdd3c50d83bf7 ("dax: remove bdev_dax_supported")

from the ext4 tree and commits:

  89b93a7b15f75 ("ext4: cleanup the dax handling in ext4_fill_super")
  7b0800d00dae8 ("dax: remove dax_capable")

from the nvdimm tree.

I'm not comfortable with resolving this in something as critical as ext4
at this point on a Friday evening with the code motion that's going on
so I've dropped the nvdimm tree for today, I'll look again on Monday.