[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2a269a4dde2976f7aaf17de9c4a7fca3552e9c7a.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 10:02:02 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Cc: dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...en8.de,
luto@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, seanjc@...gle.com, kai.huang@...el.com,
cathy.zhang@...el.com, cedric.xing@...el.com,
haitao.huang@...el.com, mark.shanahan@...el.com, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/25] x86/sgx: Support modifying SGX page type
On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 13:48 -0800, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> > I'd suggest to change this as SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MODIFY_TYPE.
>
> How about SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MOD_TYPE to be consistent with your earlier
> suggestion of SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MOD_PROTECTIONS ?
I think it would be best to introduce only one new ioctl that would
be capable of doing either operation (and use secinfo as a vessel
for additional data).
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists