linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 12/17] securityfs: Extend securityfs with namespacing support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 11 Dec 2021 11:50:26 +0100
From:   Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
To:     Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, zohar@...ux.ibm.com,
        serge@...lyn.com, containers@...ts.linux.dev,
        dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
        krzysztof.struczynski@...wei.com, roberto.sassu@...wei.com,
        mpeters@...hat.com, lhinds@...hat.com, lsturman@...hat.com,
        puiterwi@...hat.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com, jamjoom@...ibm.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paul@...l-moore.com, rgb@...hat.com,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/17] securityfs: Extend securityfs with namespacing
 support

On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 02:47:31PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> Extend 'securityfs' for support of IMA namespacing so that each
> IMA (user) namespace can have its own front-end for showing the currently
> active policy, the measurement list, number of violations and so on.
> 
> Drop the addition dentry reference and simplify cleanup to work without
> the additional reference. This enables simple cleanup of dentries upon
> umount.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
> ---
>  security/inode.c | 14 ++++----------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/inode.c b/security/inode.c
> index fee01ff4d831..c77ae8ecc464 100644
> --- a/security/inode.c
> +++ b/security/inode.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static int securityfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc)
>  
>  static int securityfs_get_tree(struct fs_context *fc)
>  {
> -	return get_tree_single(fc, securityfs_fill_super);
> +	return get_tree_keyed(fc, securityfs_fill_super, fc->user_ns);
>  }
>  
>  static const struct fs_context_operations securityfs_context_ops = {
> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ static struct file_system_type fs_type = {
>  	.name =		"securityfs",
>  	.init_fs_context = securityfs_init_fs_context,
>  	.kill_sb =	kill_litter_super,
> +	.fs_flags =	FS_USERNS_MOUNT,
>  };
>  
>  /**
> @@ -168,7 +169,6 @@ static struct dentry *securityfs_create_dentry(const char *name, umode_t mode,
>  		inode->i_fop = fops;
>  	}
>  	d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
> -	dget(dentry);
>  	inode_unlock(dir);
>  	return dentry;
>  
> @@ -306,23 +306,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(securityfs_create_symlink);
>  void securityfs_remove(struct dentry *dentry)
>  {
>  	struct user_namespace *ns;
> -	struct inode *dir;
>  
>  	if (!dentry || IS_ERR(dentry))
>  		return;
>  
>  	ns = dentry->d_sb->s_user_ns;
>  
> -	dir = d_inode(dentry->d_parent);
> -	inode_lock(dir);
>  	if (simple_positive(dentry)) {
> -		if (d_is_dir(dentry))
> -			simple_rmdir(dir, dentry);
> -		else
> -			simple_unlink(dir, dentry);
> +		d_delete(dentry);
>  		dput(dentry);

In
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211210114934.tacjnwryihrsx6ln@wittgenstein
I explained why d_delete()+d_put() only is wrong and how to fix it.