[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8c099fc2-a319-7c80-3053-ed2b39b86835@marcan.st>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 21:28:10 +0900
From: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: apple,aic: Add
apple,aic2 support
On 10/12/2021 02.28, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 01:32:44PM +0900, Hector Martin wrote:
<snip>
>> + - if:
>> + properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + contains:
>> + enum:
>> + - apple,aic2
>> + then:
>> + required:
>> + - apple,event-reg
>
> Is this property valid for aic1? If not, you need:
>
> else:
> not:
> required:
> - apple,event-reg
>
Thanks, I wasn't sure how to do this. Took me a second to realize how
the logic works here, heh.
>
> I tend to think you should just make this a separate document. There's
> not a whole lot of sharing (compared to any other interrupt controller).
Good point. I just kind of defaulted to this way because the driver is
the same (and does share a bunch), but indeed the binding doesn't really
reflect any of that. I'll split it off into another document for v2.
Might as well make the 4-argument interrupt form mandatory then (we use
it for all DTs, even the current 1-die machines, on AICv2 SoCs; the
driver can handle both but we might as well be stricter with the binding).
--
Hector Martin (marcan@...can.st)
Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub
Powered by blists - more mailing lists