[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a68ead0d882410a4cdf86f677973864fafc590d8.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 09:44:35 -0500
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@....fi>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: zohar@...ux.ibm.com, serge@...lyn.com,
christian.brauner@...ntu.com, containers@...ts.linux.dev,
dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
krzysztof.struczynski@...wei.com, roberto.sassu@...wei.com,
mpeters@...hat.com, lhinds@...hat.com, lsturman@...hat.com,
puiterwi@...hat.com, jamjoom@...ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paul@...l-moore.com, rgb@...hat.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/16] securityfs: Only use
simple_pin_fs/simple_release_fs for init_user_ns
On Sat, 2021-12-11 at 16:16 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-12-07 at 15:21 -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > To prepare for virtualization of SecurityFS, use simple_pin_fs and
> > simpe_release_fs only when init_user_ns is active.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <
> > James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
>
> What do you mean by virtualization, and how does this prepare
> securityfs for it? The commit message should be way more verbose.
Heh, well cart before horse: we're still trying to work out how to do
it correctly, so we can't really document it until we've figured that
bit out.
Once that's all sorted, the output is likely something in
Documentation/ explaining how to namespace a pseudo filesystem (since
we have quite a few of them in the kernel) rather than a commit message
which will get hard to find the next time someone wants to do this.
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists