[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211212042325.9751-1-linmq006@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 04:23:21 +0000
From: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@...il.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: linmq006@...il.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] perf stat: Fix NULL vs IS_ERR() checking in check_per_pkg
The hashmap__new() function does not return NULL on errors. It returns
ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM). Using IS_ERR() to check the return value
to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@...il.com>
---
tools/perf/util/stat.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat.c b/tools/perf/util/stat.c
index 09ea334586f2..a77052680087 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/stat.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/stat.c
@@ -311,8 +311,8 @@ static int check_per_pkg(struct evsel *counter,
if (!mask) {
mask = hashmap__new(pkg_id_hash, pkg_id_equal, NULL);
- if (!mask)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (IS_ERR(mask))
+ return PTR_ERR(mask);
counter->per_pkg_mask = mask;
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists