[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bl1kvmqg.ffs@tglx>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:10:47 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
Cc: seanjc@...gle.com, jun.nakajima@...el.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
jing2.liu@...ux.intel.com, jing2.liu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/19] kvm: x86: Introduce KVM_{G|S}ET_XSAVE2 ioctl
On Fri, Dec 10 2021 at 17:30, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 12/8/21 01:03, Yang Zhong wrote:
>> +static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_xsave2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 *state)
>> +{
>> + if (fpstate_is_confidential(&vcpu->arch.guest_fpu))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + return fpu_copy_uabi_to_guest_fpstate(&vcpu->arch.guest_fpu, state,
>> + supported_xcr0, &vcpu->arch.pkru);
>> +}
>> +
>
> I think fpu_copy_uabi_to_guest_fpstate (and therefore
> copy_uabi_from_kernel_to_xstate) needs to check that the size is
> compatible with the components in the input.
fpu_copy_uabi_to_guest_fpstate() expects that the input buffer is
correctly sized. We surely can add a size check there.
> Also, IIUC the size of the AMX state will vary in different processors.
> Is this correct? If so, this should be handled already by
> KVM_GET/SET_XSAVE2 and therefore should be part of the
> arch/x86/kernel/fpu APIs. In the future we want to support migrating a
> "small AMX" host to a "large AMX" host; and also migrating from a "large
> AMX" host to a "small AMX" host if the guest CPUID is compatible with
> the destination of the migration.
How is that supposed to work? If the AMX state size differs then the
hosts are not compatible.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists