linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] dt-bindings: misc: add property to support non-secure DSP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:57:22 +0100
From:   Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
To:     Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, ekangupt@....qualcomm.com,
        jeyr@...eaurora.org, bkumar@....qualcomm.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] dt-bindings: misc: add property to support
 non-secure DSP

On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 12:06:23PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> From: Jeya R <jeyr@...eaurora.org>
> 
> Add property to set DSP domain as non-secure.
> 
> ADSP/MDSP/SDSP are by default secured, where as CDSP can be either be
> secured/unsecured.

Wouldn't it be easier to avoid the negation and add a "qcom,secure-domain"
property instead? Given PATCH 8/8 ("arm64: dts: qcom: add non-secure
domain property to fastrpc nodes") it looks like you are intentionally
breaking DT compatibility here, but this patch does not justify why this
is necessary.

Thanks,
Stephan