[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211213061024.24285-1-quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:40:24 +0530
From: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>
To: <paulmck@...nel.org>, <josh@...htriplett.org>,
<rostedt@...dmis.org>, <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
<jiangshanlai@...il.com>, <joel@...lfernandes.org>
CC: <rcu@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<urezki@...il.com>, <frederic@...nel.org>, <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH] rcu/exp: Fix check for idle context in rcu_exp_handler
For PREEMPT_RCU, the rcu_exp_handler() function checks
whether the current CPU is in idle, by calling
rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(). However, rcu_exp_handler()
is called in IPI handler context. So, it should be checking
the idle context using rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle(). Fix this
by using rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle() instead of
rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(). Non-preempt configuration
already uses the correct check.
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 237a79989aba..1568c8ef185b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ static void rcu_exp_handler(void *unused)
*/
if (!depth) {
if (!(preempt_count() & (PREEMPT_MASK | SOFTIRQ_MASK)) ||
- rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs()) {
+ rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle()) {
rcu_report_exp_rdp(rdp);
} else {
WRITE_ONCE(rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.exp, true);
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists