[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YbdFeHVnQbT0E5kR@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 05:07:04 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, bigeasy@...utronix.de, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: make synchronous hw_queue runs RT friendly
> +#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
Please don't add these silly inverted ifdefs.
> +static inline void blk_mq_start_sync_run_hw_queue(void)
> +{
> + preempt_disable();
> +}
> +static inline void blk_mq_end_sync_run_hw_queue(void)
> +{
> + preempt_enable();
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void blk_mq_start_sync_run_hw_queue(void)
> +{
> + migrate_disable();
> +}
> +static inline void blk_mq_end_sync_run_hw_queue(void)
> +{
> + migrate_enable();
> +}
> +#endif
But more importantly: why isn't migrate_disable/enable doing the right
thing for !PREEMPT_RT to avoid this mess?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists