[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <050bb635-4462-793c-dcd4-97335ca2932c@microchip.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 14:47:24 +0100
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
CC: <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: at91: sama5d2: Name the qspi clock
On 09/12/2021 at 11:25, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> Naming clocks is a good practice. The atmel-quadspi driver supports
> an unnamed clock for the peripheral clock in order to be backward
> compatible with old DTs, but it is recommended to name the clocks
> on new DTs. The driver's bindings file requires the clock-names
> property, so name the clock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
Queued in at91-dt branch for 5.17.
Best regards,
Nicolas
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi
> index 801969c113d6..09c741e8ecb8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi
> @@ -288,6 +288,7 @@ qspi0: spi@...20000 {
> reg-names = "qspi_base", "qspi_mmap";
> interrupts = <52 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 7>;
> clocks = <&pmc PMC_TYPE_PERIPHERAL 52>;
> + clock-names = "pclk";
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> status = "disabled";
> @@ -299,6 +300,7 @@ qspi1: spi@...24000 {
> reg-names = "qspi_base", "qspi_mmap";
> interrupts = <53 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 7>;
> clocks = <&pmc PMC_TYPE_PERIPHERAL 53>;
> + clock-names = "pclk";
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> status = "disabled";
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists