linux-kernel - [PATCH MANUALSEL 5.15 5/9] KVM: selftests: Make sure kvm_create_max_vcpus test won't hit RLIMIT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211213141944.352249-5-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 Dec 2021 09:19:38 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, shuah@...nel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH MANUALSEL 5.15 5/9] KVM: selftests: Make sure kvm_create_max_vcpus test won't hit RLIMIT_NOFILE

From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit 908fa88e420f30dde6d80f092795a18ec72ca6d3 ]

With the elevated 'KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS' value kvm_create_max_vcpus test
may hit RLIMIT_NOFILE limits:

 # ./kvm_create_max_vcpus
 KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID: 4096
 KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS: 1024
 Testing creating 1024 vCPUs, with IDs 0...1023.
 /dev/kvm not available (errno: 24), skipping test

Adjust RLIMIT_NOFILE limits to make sure KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS fds can be
opened. Note, raising hard limit ('rlim_max') requires CAP_SYS_RESOURCE
capability which is generally not needed to run kvm selftests (but without
raising the limit the test is doomed to fail anyway).

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Message-Id: <20211123135953.667434-1-vkuznets@...hat.com>
[Skip the test if the hard limit can be raised. - Paolo]
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 .../selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c      | 30 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c
index 0299cd81b8ba2..aa3795cd7bd3d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <string.h>
+#include <sys/resource.h>
 
 #include "test_util.h"
 
@@ -40,10 +41,39 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 {
 	int kvm_max_vcpu_id = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID);
 	int kvm_max_vcpus = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS);
+	/*
+	 * Number of file descriptors reqired, KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS for vCPU fds +
+	 * an arbitrary number for everything else.
+	 */
+	int nr_fds_wanted = kvm_max_vcpus + 100;
+	struct rlimit rl;
 
 	pr_info("KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID: %d\n", kvm_max_vcpu_id);
 	pr_info("KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS: %d\n", kvm_max_vcpus);
 
+	/*
+	 * Check that we're allowed to open nr_fds_wanted file descriptors and
+	 * try raising the limits if needed.
+	 */
+	TEST_ASSERT(!getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &rl), "getrlimit() failed!");
+
+	if (rl.rlim_cur < nr_fds_wanted) {
+		rl.rlim_cur = nr_fds_wanted;
+		if (rl.rlim_max < nr_fds_wanted) {
+			int old_rlim_max = rl.rlim_max;
+			rl.rlim_max = nr_fds_wanted;
+
+			int r = setrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &rl);
+			if (r < 0) {
+				printf("RLIMIT_NOFILE hard limit is too low (%d, wanted %d)\n",
+				       old_rlim_max, nr_fds_wanted);
+				exit(KSFT_SKIP);
+			}
+		} else {
+			TEST_ASSERT(!setrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &rl), "setrlimit() failed!");
+		}
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Upstream KVM prior to 4.8 does not support KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID.
 	 * Userspace is supposed to use KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS as the maximum ID
-- 
2.33.0