[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <022620db-13ad-8118-5296-ae2913d41f1f@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:06:22 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
Cc: seanjc@...gle.com, jun.nakajima@...el.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
jing2.liu@...ux.intel.com, jing2.liu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/19] kvm: x86: Emulate WRMSR of guest IA32_XFD
On 12/8/21 01:03, Yang Zhong wrote:
> + /*
> + * Update IA32_XFD to the guest value so #NM can be
> + * raised properly in the guest. Instead of directly
> + * writing the MSR, call a helper to avoid breaking
> + * per-cpu cached value in fpu core.
> + */
> + fpregs_lock();
> + current->thread.fpu.fpstate->xfd = data;
This is wrong, it should be written in vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.
> + xfd_update_state(current->thread.fpu.fpstate);
This is okay though, so that KVM_SET_MSR will not write XFD and WRMSR will.
That said, I think xfd_update_state should not have an argument.
current->thread.fpu.fpstate->xfd is the only fpstate that should be
synced with the xfd_state per-CPU variable.
Paolo
> + fpregs_unlock();
Powered by blists - more mailing lists