[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47efb431-6e75-40ac-484c-d84cf4157a04@foss.st.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 17:26:37 +0100
From: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: Olivier MOYSAN <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...com>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com>,
Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@...s.st.com>,
Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...s.st.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/STM32 ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] ASoC: dt-bindings: stm32: i2s: add
audio-graph-card port
Hi Rob,
On 12/11/21 9:05 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 7:52 AM Alexandre TORGUE
> <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rob
>>
>> On 12/1/21 11:34 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 11:25:27AM +0100, Olivier MOYSAN wrote:
>>>> Hi Rob,
>>>>
>>>> On 11/25/21 10:26 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:40:50 +0100, Olivier Moysan wrote:
>>>>>> The STM2 I2S DAI can be connected via the audio-graph-card.
>>>>>> Add port entry into the bindings.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/st,stm32-i2s.yaml | 5 +++++
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
>>>>> following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
>>>>> incorrect. These may not be new warnings.
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
>>>>> This will change in the future.
>>>>>
>>>>> Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1559750
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> audio-controller@...0b000: 'port' does not match any of the regexes: '^port@[0-9]', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157a-dk1.dt.yaml
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-dk2.dt.yaml
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This warning is not a new one.
>>>>
>>>> The i2s2 node in stm32mp15xx-dkx.dtsi would require the following binding:
>>>> port:
>>>> $ref: audio-graph-port.yaml#
>>>> unevaluatedProperties: false
>>>>
>>>> However the spi binding requires to introduce a unit address:
>>>> patternProperties:
>>>> '^port@[0-9]':
>>>> $ref: audio-graph-port.yaml#
>>>> unevaluatedProperties: false
>>>>
>>>> The warning can be removed by re-ordering the bindings patches in the serie,
>>>> as "additionalProperties: true" makes the check more tolerant on extra
>>>> properties.
>>>
>>> That's never right.
>>>
>>>> The patch "ASoC: dt-bindings: stm32: i2s: add audio-graph-card port" can
>>>> even be merely dropped.
>>>> So, I suggest to resend the serie without audio-graph-card patch.
>>>
>>> Only if you aren't using audio-graph-card.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Does it sound too permissive to you ?
>>>
>>> I think perhaps you need to combine the schemas into 1. Or you need to
>>> restructure your dtsi files such that you only add spi specific
>>> properties when spi mode is enabled and only add i2s specific properties
>>> when i2s mode is enabled. Or use the /delete-property/ directive.
>>
>> Initially the aim of this series was to fix a "make W=1" warnings seen
>> on spi and i2s nodes (duplicate unit-address). Moving both nodes in a
>> common node + using a different compatible depending on SPI or I2S usage
>> sounded good) but it is not enough. In this series the common node is
>> named as following: "spi2s2: spi@...0b000". It is fine for a spi usage
>> but if we want to use this "common node" with I2S compatible and
>> specific bindings, the node name remains spi@... and then specific spi
>> checks are done. For this with this series applied we got this issue
>> reported by spi-controller.yaml:
>>
>> spi@...0b000: port@0: 'compatible' is a required property
>>
>> So, if we use two separates nodes we got W=1 warning and if we use a
>> common node we got yaml check issue. One possibility would be to use a
>> common node with a new node name (for example i2spi@...) but I think it
>> is not acceptable.
>
> It is acceptable, see this thread[1].
>
> Rob
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211203183517.11390-1-semen.protsenko@linaro.org/
Perfect! So we can abandon this series. Do you know if a patch has been
sent to also update scripts/Makefile.lib ?
Regards
Alex
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists