lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YbeAAyWbkh5frMGc@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 Dec 2021 09:16:51 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Laibin Qiu <qiulaibin@...wei.com>
Cc:     axboe@...nel.dk, yi.zhang@...wei.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] block/wbt: fix negative inflight counter when
 remove scsi device

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 12:09:07PM +0800, Laibin Qiu wrote:
> Submit_bio
>                                                          scsi_remove_device
>                                                          sd_remove
>                                                          del_gendisk
>                                                          blk_unregister_queue
>                                                          elv_unregister_queue
>                                                          wbt_enable_default
>                                                          <= Set rwb->enable_state (ON)
> q_qos_track
> <= rwb->enable_state (ON)
> ^^^^^^ this request will mark WBT_TRACKED without inflight add and will
> lead to drop rqw->inflight to -1 in wbt_done() which will trigger IO hung.
> 
> Fix this by judge whether QUEUE_FLAG_REGISTERED is marked to distinguish
> scsi remove scene.
> Fixes: 76a8040817b4b ("blk-wbt: make sure throttle is enabled properly")
> Signed-off-by: Laibin Qiu <qiulaibin@...wei.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-wbt.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-wbt.c b/block/blk-wbt.c
> index 3ed71b8da887..537f77bb1365 100644
> --- a/block/blk-wbt.c
> +++ b/block/blk-wbt.c
> @@ -637,6 +637,10 @@ void wbt_enable_default(struct request_queue *q)
>  {
>  	struct rq_qos *rqos = wbt_rq_qos(q);
>  
> +	/* Queue not registered? Maybe shutting down... */
> +	if (!blk_queue_registered(q))
> +		return;

Wouldn't it make more sense to simply not call wbt_enable_default from
elv_unregister_queue?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ