[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4493a665-23f9-0a39-6d9a-ec3bb97e7015@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 10:05:43 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smp: Fix the comments of smp_call_function_many()
On 12/12/21 7:57 PM, Zhen Lei wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
> index 01a7c1706a58b1d..6ec884f41b7506d 100644
> --- a/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -861,6 +861,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smp_call_function_any);
> #define SCF_WAIT (1U << 0)
> #define SCF_RUN_LOCAL (1U << 1)
>
> +/**
> + * smp_call_function_many_cond(): Run a function on a set of CPUs.
> + * @scf_flags: Bitmask that controls the operation. If %SCF_WAIT is set,
> + * wait (atomically) until function has completed on other CPUs. If
> + * %SCF_RUN_LOCAL is set, the function will also be run locally
> + * if the local CPU is set in the @cpumask.
> + */
Fixing up the smp_call_function_many() comment is a good idea. But, the
new smp_call_function_many_cond() comment duplicates these which are
_just_ above it:
> /*
> * Flags to be used as scf_flags argument of smp_call_function_many_cond().
> *
> * %SCF_WAIT: Wait until function execution is completed
> * %SCF_RUN_LOCAL: Run also locally if local cpu is set in cpumask
> */
> #define SCF_WAIT (1U << 0)
> #define SCF_RUN_LOCAL (1U << 1)
Could we comment the bits in one place?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists