[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgQQhQakEgKeCcDp==wk__pu32=k-1m63prWx+XjzyhHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:29:36 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Michal Koutny <mkoutny@...e.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jim Newsome <jnewsome@...project.org>,
Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Security Officers <security@...nel.org>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] cgroup: Allocate cgroup_file_ctx for kernfs_open_file->priv
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 11:18 AM Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> v2: union dropped from cgroup_file_ctx and the procs iterator is embedded in
> cgroup_file_ctx as suggested by Linus.
Thanks.
Looking at the patch, I mostly like the end result, although it
highlights how odd that __cgroup_procs_start() thing is.
I wonder if that 'started' flag could be removed, and the
css_task_iter_start() thing could be done at allocation time?
But I may just be confused. This is not a NAK, just a "that pattern
looks slightly odd to me".
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists