[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <729C0734-B346-455A-A95D-A9C170369F72@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:59:41 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
To: German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
CC: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] perf script: Add "struct machine" parameter to process_event callback
On December 13, 2021 3:31:47 PM GMT-03:00, German Gomez <german.gomez@....com> wrote:
>
>On 13/12/2021 18:22, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> Thanks for the suggestion. It looks like we can skip this patch if we
>>> can get the arch value that way.
>> So the first one is already upstream, will you post a v2?
>>
>> - Arnaldo
>
>Hi Arnaldo,
>
>I sent a v2 where this patch was removed. The upstreamed patch (1/4
>here) remained the same.
Thanks, I'll check.
- Arnaldo
>
>https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211207180653.1147374-1-german.gomez@arm.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists