[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ybe7Ot8b/N4yy3TM@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:29:30 -0800
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@...wei.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
keescook@...omium.org, jlayton@...nel.org, bfields@...ldses.org,
yzaikin@...gle.com, wangle6@...wei.com,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Add a group of macro functions to initcall the
sysctl table of each feature
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:04:48AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> If you look at __register_sysctl_table the core registration function
> you will see that all directory entries get reduced to simply a path
> component. So they have nothing but their names as input into
> the sysctl subsystem.
>
> Further __register_sysctl_table goes in a loop through the path
> and does get_subdir to find or create the directory.
>
> Which means that if two places were to register sysctls in
> the "fs" directory they would both use the safe "fs" directory
> and whoever can first would create it.
>
> Which should mean that worrying about ordering is completely
> unnecessary.
>
> What am I missing?
I was being too cautious, sorry for not having dug enough.
Then this makes things much easier. Thanks!
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists