[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211213074919.GC20758@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 08:49:19 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hch@....de,
robin.murphy@....com, penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, vbabka@...e.cz, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
John.p.donnelly@...cle.com, kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 0/5] Avoid requesting page from DMA zone when
no managed pages
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 03:39:25PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > As said at above, ia64 and riscv don't have ZONE_DMA at all, they just
> > > cover low 4G with ZONE_DMA32 alone.
> >
> > If you do not have devices that are crap and cannot address the full
> > memory then you dont need these special zones.
>
> I am not a DMA expert, with my understanding, on x86_64 and arm64, we
> have PCIe devices which dma mask is 32bit
Yes, way to many, and they keep getting newly introduce as well. Also
weirdo masks like 40, 44 or 48 bits.
> , means they can only address
> ZONE_DMA32.
Yes and no. Offset between cpu physical and device address make this
complicated, even ignoring iommus.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists