lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 13 Dec 2021 14:11:26 -0800
From:   Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
CC:     <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        <bp@...en8.de>, <luto@...nel.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
        <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>, <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        <kai.huang@...el.com>, <cathy.zhang@...el.com>,
        <cedric.xing@...el.com>, <haitao.huang@...el.com>,
        <mark.shanahan@...el.com>, <hpa@...or.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/25] x86/sgx: Move PTE zap code to separate function

Hi Jarkko,

On 12/10/2021 11:52 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 13:30 -0800, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>> Hi Jarkko,
>>
>> On 12/4/2021 2:59 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 11:23:05AM -0800, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>>>> The SGX reclaimer removes page table entries pointing to pages that are
>>>> moved to swap. SGX2 enables changes to pages belonging to an initialized
>>>> enclave, for example changing page permissions. Supporting SGX2 requires
>>>> this ability to remove page table entries that is available in the
>>>> SGX reclaimer code.
>>>
>>> Missing: why SGX2 requirest this?
>>
>> The above paragraph states that SGX2 needs to remove page table entries
>> because it modifies page permissions. Could you please elaborate what is
>> missing?
> 
> It does not say why SGX2 requires an ability to remove page table entries.

Are you saying that modification of EPCM page permissions is not a 
reason to remove page table entries pointing to those pages?

Reinette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ