[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <192e252a-653f-2221-73dd-99894c134a37@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 14:11:26 -0800
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
CC: <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<bp@...en8.de>, <luto@...nel.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>, <seanjc@...gle.com>,
<kai.huang@...el.com>, <cathy.zhang@...el.com>,
<cedric.xing@...el.com>, <haitao.huang@...el.com>,
<mark.shanahan@...el.com>, <hpa@...or.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/25] x86/sgx: Move PTE zap code to separate function
Hi Jarkko,
On 12/10/2021 11:52 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 13:30 -0800, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>> Hi Jarkko,
>>
>> On 12/4/2021 2:59 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 11:23:05AM -0800, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>>>> The SGX reclaimer removes page table entries pointing to pages that are
>>>> moved to swap. SGX2 enables changes to pages belonging to an initialized
>>>> enclave, for example changing page permissions. Supporting SGX2 requires
>>>> this ability to remove page table entries that is available in the
>>>> SGX reclaimer code.
>>>
>>> Missing: why SGX2 requirest this?
>>
>> The above paragraph states that SGX2 needs to remove page table entries
>> because it modifies page permissions. Could you please elaborate what is
>> missing?
>
> It does not say why SGX2 requires an ability to remove page table entries.
Are you saying that modification of EPCM page permissions is not a
reason to remove page table entries pointing to those pages?
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists