linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the rust tree with the origin tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 Dec 2021 22:33:34 +0000
From:   broonie@...nel.org
To:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc:     Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...gle.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the rust tree with the origin tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the rust tree got a conflict in:

  tools/include/linux/lockdep.h

between commit:

  3a49cc22d31ec ("tools/lib/lockdep: drop leftover liblockdep headers")

from the origin tree and commit:

  ab4cc3d9c564d ("kallsyms: increase maximum kernel symbol length to 512")

from the rust tree.

I fixed it up by removing lockdep.h again and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.