[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YbfOWXZJAZDuEU1V@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:51:05 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Sandy Huang <hjc@...k-chips.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, - <opensource@...k-chips.com>,
David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>,
~okias/devicetree@...ts.sr.ht, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: convert power domain node for rockchip DW
MIPI DSI
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 11:55:58AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Am Montag, 6. Dezember 2021, 22:26:50 CET schrieb David Heidelberg:
> > Convert into YAML format into format, which can be validated.
> >
> > Changes:
> > - drop panel from example
>
> the patch subject is strange, talking about a "power domain node".
> That needs a fix.
>
> Some more things below.
>
>
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + oneOf:
> > + - items:
> > + - enum:
> > + - rockchip,px30-mipi-dsi
> > + - rockchip,rk3288-mipi-dsi
> > + - rockchip,rk3399-mipi-dsi
> > + - const: snps,dw-mipi-dsi
>
> > + - items:
> > + - const: rockchip,px30-mipi-dsi
> > + - items:
> > + - const: rockchip,rk3288-mipi-dsi
> > + - items:
> > + - const: rockchip,rk3399-mipi-dsi
>
> what are these for?
>
> I see that px30 uses the dsi without the snps part, but you
> can also just add a patch adding that second compatible to px30.dtsi
Or drop snps,dw-mipi-dsi as it doesn't seem to be all that meaningful.
But I guess that's more invasive so maybe stick with changing px30.
>
> I don't think we need to support both ways.
Agreed.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists