linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/8] signal: Drop signals received after a fatal signal has been processed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211213225350.27481-2-ebiederm@xmission.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:53:44 -0600
From:   "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>,
        Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] signal: Drop signals received after a fatal signal has been processed

In 403bad72b67d ("coredump: only SIGKILL should interrupt the
coredumping task") Oleg modified the kernel to drop all signals that
come in during a coredump except SIGKILL, and suggested that it might
be a good idea to generalize that to other cases after the process has
received a fatal signal.

Semantically it does not make sense to perform any signal delivery
after the process has already been killed.

When a signal is sent while a process is dying today the signal is
placed in the signal queue by __send_signal and a single task of the
process is woken up with signal_wake_up, if there are any tasks that
have not set PF_EXITING.

Take things one step farther and have prepare_signal report that all
signals that come after a process has been killed should be ignored.
While retaining the historical exception of allowing SIGKILL to
interrupt coredumps.

Remove the SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT test from complete_signal, as it is no
longer possible for signal processing to reach complete_signal when
SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT is true.

Update the comment in fs/coredump.c to make it clear coredumps are
special in being able to receive SIGKILL.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
 fs/coredump.c   | 2 +-
 kernel/signal.c | 5 ++---
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/coredump.c b/fs/coredump.c
index 7b91fb32dbb8..a9c25f20118f 100644
--- a/fs/coredump.c
+++ b/fs/coredump.c
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static int zap_process(struct task_struct *start, int exit_code, int flags)
 	struct task_struct *t;
 	int nr = 0;

-	/* ignore all signals except SIGKILL, see prepare_signal() */
+	/* Allow SIGKILL, see prepare_signal() */
 	start->signal->flags = SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP | flags;
 	start->signal->group_exit_code = exit_code;
 	start->signal->group_stop_count = 0;
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 7e305a8ec7c2..cdccbacac685 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -914,11 +914,11 @@ static bool prepare_signal(int sig, struct task_struct *p, bool force)
 				sigaddset(&dumper->pending.signal, SIGKILL);
 				signal_wake_up(dumper, 1);
 			}
-			return false;
 		}
 		/*
-		 * The process is in the middle of dying, nothing to do.
+		 * The process is in the middle of dying, drop the signal.
 		 */
+		return false;
 	} else if (sig_kernel_stop(sig)) {
 		/*
 		 * This is a stop signal.  Remove SIGCONT from all queues.
@@ -1039,7 +1039,6 @@ static void complete_signal(int sig, struct task_struct *p, enum pid_type type)
 	 * then start taking the whole group down immediately.
 	 */
 	if (sig_fatal(p, sig) &&
-	    !(signal->flags & SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT) &&
 	    !sigismember(&t->real_blocked, sig) &&
 	    (sig == SIGKILL || !p->ptrace)) {
 		/*
-- 
2.29.2