[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8523ca32-d36f-6e0b-0115-5e07553396f1@microchip.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 08:51:25 +0000
From: <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To: <vkoul@...nel.org>
CC: <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>, <richard.genoud@...il.com>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
<Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
<mripard@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/13] dmaengine: at_xdmac: Move the free desc to the
tail of the desc list
Hi, Vinod,
On 12/13/21 10:07 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On 25-11-21, 11:00, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>> So that we don't use the same desc over and over again.
>
> Please use full para in the changelog and not a continuation of the
> patch title!
Ok, will add a better commit description. Here and in other patches where
your comment applies.
>
> and why is wrong with using same desc over and over? Any benefits of not
> doing so?
Not wrong, but if we move the free desc to the tail of the list, then the
sequence of descriptors is more track-able in case of debug. You would
know which descriptor should come next and you could easier catch
concurrency over descriptors for example. I saw virt-dma uses
list_splice_tail_init() as well, I found it a good idea, so I thought to
follow the core driver.
Cheers,
ta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists