linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 08/13] dmaengine: at_xdmac: Move the free desc to the tail of the desc list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 Dec 2021 14:30:55 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com
Cc:     Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com, richard.genoud@...il.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
        Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        mripard@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/13] dmaengine: at_xdmac: Move the free desc to the
 tail of the desc list

On 13-12-21, 14:29, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 13-12-21, 08:51, Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com wrote:
> > Hi, Vinod,
> > 
> > On 12/13/21 10:07 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> > > 
> > > On 25-11-21, 11:00, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> > >> So that we don't use the same desc over and over again.
> > > 
> > > Please use full para in the changelog and not a continuation of the
> > > patch title!
> > 
> > Ok, will add a better commit description. Here and in other patches where
> > your comment applies.
> 
> Great!
> 
> > > 
> > > and why is wrong with using same desc over and over? Any benefits of not
> > > doing so?
> > 
> > Not wrong, but if we move the free desc to the tail of the list, then the
> > sequence of descriptors is more track-able in case of debug. You would
> > know which descriptor should come next and you could easier catch
> > concurrency over descriptors for example. I saw virt-dma uses
> > list_splice_tail_init() as well, I found it a good idea, so I thought to
> > follow the core driver.
> 
> Okay, I would be good to add this motivation in the change log. I am
> sure after few you would also wonder why you did this change :)

Also, pls submit serial patches to Greg separately. I guess he saw the
title and overlooked those...

-- 
~Vinod