[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <163936544519.22433.13400436295732112065@noble.neil.brown.name>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 14:17:25 +1100
From: "NeilBrown" <neilb@...e.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"OGAWA Hirofumi" <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3] FAT: use io_schedule_timeout() instead of congestion_wait()
congestion_wait() in this context is just a sleep - block devices do not
support congestion signalling any more.
The goal for this wait, which was introduced in Commit ae78bf9c4f5f
("[PATCH] add -o flush for fat") is to wait for any recently written
data to get to storage. We currently have no direct mechanism to do
this, so a simple wait that behaves identically to the current
congestion_wait() is the best we can do.
This is a step towards removing congestion_wait()
Acked-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
---
Hi Andrew,
I believe you are an appropriate conduit for fs/fat patches once that
have been suitably acked.
Thanks
NeilBrown
fs/fat/file.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fat/file.c b/fs/fat/file.c
index 13855ba49cd9..a5a309fcc7fa 100644
--- a/fs/fat/file.c
+++ b/fs/fat/file.c
@@ -175,9 +175,10 @@ long fat_generic_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
static int fat_file_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
{
if ((filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE) &&
- MSDOS_SB(inode->i_sb)->options.flush) {
+ MSDOS_SB(inode->i_sb)->options.flush) {
fat_flush_inodes(inode->i_sb, inode, NULL);
- congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
+ set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ io_schedule_timeout(HZ/10);
}
return 0;
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists