lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 13 Dec 2021 10:29:12 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 037/171] bpf, sockmap: Attach map progs to psock early for feature probes

From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>

commit 38207a5e81230d6ffbdd51e5fa5681be5116dcae upstream.

When a TCP socket is added to a sock map we look at the programs attached
to the map to determine what proto op hooks need to be changed. Before
the patch in the 'fixes' tag there were only two categories -- the empty
set of programs or a TX policy. In any case the base set handled the
receive case.

After the fix we have an optimized program for receive that closes a small,
but possible, race on receive. This program is loaded only when the map the
psock is being added to includes a RX policy. Otherwise, the race is not
possible so we don't need to handle the race condition.

In order for the call to sk_psock_init() to correctly evaluate the above
conditions all progs need to be set in the psock before the call. However,
in the current code this is not the case. We end up evaluating the
requirements on the old prog state. If your psock is attached to multiple
maps -- for example a tx map and rx map -- then the second update would pull
in the correct maps. But, the other pattern with a single rx enabled map
the correct receive hooks are not used. The result is the race fixed by the
patch in the fixes tag below may still be seen in this case.

To fix we simply set all psock->progs before doing the call into
sock_map_init(). With this the init() call gets the full list of programs
and chooses the correct proto ops on the first iteration instead of
requiring the second update to pull them in. This fixes the race case when
only a single map is used.

Fixes: c5d2177a72a16 ("bpf, sockmap: Fix race in ingress receive verdict with redirect to self")
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211119181418.353932-2-john.fastabend@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/core/sock_map.c |   10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/net/core/sock_map.c
+++ b/net/core/sock_map.c
@@ -282,6 +282,12 @@ static int sock_map_link(struct bpf_map
 
 	if (msg_parser)
 		psock_set_prog(&psock->progs.msg_parser, msg_parser);
+	if (stream_parser)
+		psock_set_prog(&psock->progs.stream_parser, stream_parser);
+	if (stream_verdict)
+		psock_set_prog(&psock->progs.stream_verdict, stream_verdict);
+	if (skb_verdict)
+		psock_set_prog(&psock->progs.skb_verdict, skb_verdict);
 
 	ret = sock_map_init_proto(sk, psock);
 	if (ret < 0)
@@ -292,14 +298,10 @@ static int sock_map_link(struct bpf_map
 		ret = sk_psock_init_strp(sk, psock);
 		if (ret)
 			goto out_unlock_drop;
-		psock_set_prog(&psock->progs.stream_verdict, stream_verdict);
-		psock_set_prog(&psock->progs.stream_parser, stream_parser);
 		sk_psock_start_strp(sk, psock);
 	} else if (!stream_parser && stream_verdict && !psock->saved_data_ready) {
-		psock_set_prog(&psock->progs.stream_verdict, stream_verdict);
 		sk_psock_start_verdict(sk,psock);
 	} else if (!stream_verdict && skb_verdict && !psock->saved_data_ready) {
-		psock_set_prog(&psock->progs.skb_verdict, skb_verdict);
 		sk_psock_start_verdict(sk, psock);
 	}
 	write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ