[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211213092935.887051130@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 10:30:47 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jack Andersen <jackoalan@...il.com>,
Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
Stable@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 77/88] iio: dln2-adc: Fix lockdep complaint
From: Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>
commit 59f92868176f191eefde70d284bdfc1ed76a84bc upstream.
When reading the voltage:
$ cat /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio\:device0/in_voltage0_raw
Lockdep complains:
[ 153.910616] ======================================================
[ 153.916918] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 153.923221] 5.14.0+ #5 Not tainted
[ 153.926692] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 153.932992] cat/717 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 153.937525] c2585358 (&indio_dev->mlock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: iio_device_claim_direct_mode+0x28/0x44
[ 153.946541]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 153.952487] c2585860 (&dln2->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dln2_adc_read_raw+0x94/0x2bc [dln2_adc]
[ 153.961152]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
Fix this by not calling into the iio core underneath the dln2->mutex lock.
Fixes: 7c0299e879dd ("iio: adc: Add support for DLN2 ADC")
Cc: Jack Andersen <jackoalan@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211018113731.25723-1-noralf@tronnes.org
Cc: <Stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/iio/adc/dln2-adc.c | 15 +++++++--------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/dln2-adc.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/dln2-adc.c
@@ -248,7 +248,6 @@ static int dln2_adc_set_chan_period(stru
static int dln2_adc_read(struct dln2_adc *dln2, unsigned int channel)
{
int ret, i;
- struct iio_dev *indio_dev = platform_get_drvdata(dln2->pdev);
u16 conflict;
__le16 value;
int olen = sizeof(value);
@@ -257,13 +256,9 @@ static int dln2_adc_read(struct dln2_adc
.chan = channel,
};
- ret = iio_device_claim_direct_mode(indio_dev);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
-
ret = dln2_adc_set_chan_enabled(dln2, channel, true);
if (ret < 0)
- goto release_direct;
+ return ret;
ret = dln2_adc_set_port_enabled(dln2, true, &conflict);
if (ret < 0) {
@@ -300,8 +295,6 @@ disable_port:
dln2_adc_set_port_enabled(dln2, false, NULL);
disable_chan:
dln2_adc_set_chan_enabled(dln2, channel, false);
-release_direct:
- iio_device_release_direct_mode(indio_dev);
return ret;
}
@@ -337,10 +330,16 @@ static int dln2_adc_read_raw(struct iio_
switch (mask) {
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
+ ret = iio_device_claim_direct_mode(indio_dev);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
mutex_lock(&dln2->mutex);
ret = dln2_adc_read(dln2, chan->channel);
mutex_unlock(&dln2->mutex);
+ iio_device_release_direct_mode(indio_dev);
+
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists